The following figure shows the Schematics used to compare the frequency response of NuTube 6P1 vs 12AX7 in starved mode:
12AX7 has a 1M pulldown on grid input while NuTube 6P1 has a bias circuit to adjust the bias voltage on the grid between 0V and 3.3V, connected to the grid via 33K series resistor, the typical grid current of 6uA has been added, since the model does not include this bias current.
Anode/plate output resistor load is 500K in both circuits.
Both circuits have anode/plate connected to +24V via a series resistor and a potentiometer to adjust load.
NuTube 6P1 has resistor values multiplied by 10 to be able to sweep around the maximum gain point.
The following figure shows the starved 12AX7 frequency response between 10 Hz and 20 kHz with anode load potentiometer varying from 0 to 1. A maximum gain of 24.6 dB is obtained with a load resistance of 50K
The following figure shows the NuTube 6P1 frequency response between 10 Hz and 20 kHz with anode load potentiometer varying from 0 to 1. A maximum gain of 15.9 dB is obtained with a load resistance of 400K. NuTube 6P1 application note shows a gain of 14dB with anode powered at +12V and 17 dB with anode powered at +30V, which actually corresponds to simulations.
Bypass capacitors are also compared between 10nF and 10uF. NuTube 6P1 bypass capacitor value must be multiplied by 15 in order to have a similar response at lower frequencies:
I purchased some KORG NuTube 6P1 triodes samples and I wanted to build a guitar preamp circuit to get the characteristic tube sound and distortion.
I could not find any guitar preamp amplifier schematics that would suit me so I decided to make my own circuit based on the reference circuit and add some gain, tone stack and volume controls
I am more of a "SPICE simulation" kind of guy than a "bread-boarding" guy, also because I like to use SMD components and try to be closer to the final guitar pedal than just a prototype. I have quite some confidence in SPICE results provided that models are accurate.
I wanted to simulate my NuTube circuit before building a guitar pedal or amp. The problem is that there were no NuTube SPICE models available.
I found that Koren had obtained a method for obtaining tube SPICE parameters from datasheet curves plate current (Ip) vs plate-cathode voltage (Vpk) for variable Vgk (grid-cathode voltage). Actually the models I have from traditional triodes, all come from using this method.
Mu is 18, much lower than 12AX7 with a value around 100.
The exponent EX is quite high, around 4, compared to 1.4 on the 12AX7
A high KG1 value corresponds to a low plate current.
KP which is used in the high plate voltage region is 452 compared to 600.
KVB knee voltage is 4.2, much lower than 12AX7 value of 300.
RGI, CCG, CGP and CCP are obtained from the Datasheet.
Anyway, I had my NuTube 6P1 SPICE model and I could start designing and simulating my guitar preamp.
Then the user Teemuk from DIYstompboxes forum posted an interesting comment on this thread, where he believed that KORG NuTube 6P1 response was not much different from a traditional tube (like 12AX7 or 12AZ7) in "starved" mode, that is, with a low plate/anode voltage.
There are several advantages praised by KORG about this NuTube: smaller size, higher reliability and low power voltage.
But if a similar response is obtained from a traditional "starved" tube powered at the same low voltages, one of the most important advantages does not exist anymore.
So I decided to try to make a comparison between them using LTSpice.
Unfortunately, according to some reports, it appears that existing SPICE models do not work well in the starved region, these are approximated models, and the starved region is just a tiny area in the curves that go up to 400V.
But I knew how to get SPICE parameters models from curves, so if I could find accurate current/voltage curves in the starved region I could make a model suited for those low voltages.
Again, using the Koren's method I got the following current-voltage approximated curves for 12AX7 triode:
And again, there is some dispersion in the curves from the experimental points. The worst dispersion happens at the knee at Va=1V for Vgk=0V, where plate current is around 60uA instead of 100uA.
This is the obtained 12AX7 starved model: .SUBCKT 12AX7_l 1 2 3 ; P G C (Triode) X1 1 2 3 TRIODE MU= 81.48 EX=0.626 KG1=1865.5 KP=248.15 KVB=300.0 VCT=0.00 RGI=2000 CCG=2.3p CGP=2.4p CCP=0.9p ; * http://www.valvewizard.co.uk/Triodes_at_low_voltages_Blencowe.pdf 24-May-2017 .ENDS
Mu is lower, Exponent EX is lower, KG1 is higher (lower plate current), KP is lower and KVB is the same.
These same curves can now be simulated using LTSpice. These are the schematics:
Starved 12AX7 plate current is then drawn with plate-cathode Vpk voltage (V2) varying from 0V to 24V in 0.1V steps, using grid-cathode voltage Vgk (V1) as a parameter varying from -0.5V to 0V in 0.1V steps:
The following figures show the current-voltage curves obtained from LTSpice compared to scaled values from datasheet: